<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: $250 million for translating medical research into real benefits	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.myhealthcareer.com.au/dietetics/250-million-for-translating-medical-research-into-real-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.myhealthcareer.com.au/dietetics/250-million-for-translating-medical-research-into-real-benefits/</link>
	<description>Explore your future health career!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 02:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dr Robert Peers		</title>
		<link>https://www.myhealthcareer.com.au/dietetics/250-million-for-translating-medical-research-into-real-benefits/#comment-390</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr Robert Peers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.myhealthcareer.com.au/?p=10965#comment-390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a practising GP--with a big interest in preventive and therapeutic nutrition--I have to say that I have serious misgivings about the MRFF and its spinoff, the Biomedical Translational Fund.

I am not against giving more money to the truly innovative medical researchers [like Dr Jeff Holst, with his plan to starve tumours of key nutrients], but our national problem is that most medical researchers are well and truly followers, not innovative leaders.

I believe we could get far bigger and better results via a publicly supported Health Research Future Fund, based on advanced preventive and therapeutic nutrition. I do hope to set this up, with some &quot;foodie docs&quot;, in the near future. We can offer the public such nutritional treats as the primary prevention--including during gestation--of the common mental and physical disorders seen so often in people eating the Western diet.

These include anxiety, ADHD, bipolar, schizophrenia, diabetes, Alzheimer&#039;s and autoimmune disorders.

So, in time, it is likely that nutritional advances will weigh into the cost/benefit analyses done by the BTF, meaning that many new biomedical start-ups may go to the wall, due to public health nutrition already providing the answer to the disease in question.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a practising GP&#8211;with a big interest in preventive and therapeutic nutrition&#8211;I have to say that I have serious misgivings about the MRFF and its spinoff, the Biomedical Translational Fund.</p>
<p>I am not against giving more money to the truly innovative medical researchers [like Dr Jeff Holst, with his plan to starve tumours of key nutrients], but our national problem is that most medical researchers are well and truly followers, not innovative leaders.</p>
<p>I believe we could get far bigger and better results via a publicly supported Health Research Future Fund, based on advanced preventive and therapeutic nutrition. I do hope to set this up, with some &#8220;foodie docs&#8221;, in the near future. We can offer the public such nutritional treats as the primary prevention&#8211;including during gestation&#8211;of the common mental and physical disorders seen so often in people eating the Western diet.</p>
<p>These include anxiety, ADHD, bipolar, schizophrenia, diabetes, Alzheimer&#8217;s and autoimmune disorders.</p>
<p>So, in time, it is likely that nutritional advances will weigh into the cost/benefit analyses done by the BTF, meaning that many new biomedical start-ups may go to the wall, due to public health nutrition already providing the answer to the disease in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
